Rectal Cancer Survival for Residual Carcinoma In Situ Vs. Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is associated with improved survival. It is unclear whether residual carcinoma in situ portends a similar outcome. OBJECTIVE: To compare survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy and achieved pathologic carcinoma in situ versus pathologic complete response. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National public database. PATIENTS: A total of 4,594 patients in the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2016 with locally advanced rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy, underwent surgery, and had node-negative, ypTis or ypT0 on final pathology were included. 4,321 (94.1%) had ypT0 and 273 (5.9%) had ypTis on final pathology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival. RESULTS: Median age was 60 years. 1,822 patients (39.7%) were female. 54.5% (n = 2,503) had stage II disease and 45.5% (n = 2,091) had stage III disease on initial staging. The ypTis group had decreased overall survival compared to the ypT0 group (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.04-1.95, p = 0.028). Other factors associated with decreased overall survival were an older age at diagnosis, increasing Charlson-Deyo score, and poorly differentiated tumor grade. Variables associated with improved survival were female sex, private insurance, and receipt of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. For the total cohort, there was no difference in survival between clinical stage 2 versus stage 3. LIMITATIONS: Standard therapy versus total neoadjuvant therapy were unable to be abstracted. Overall survival was defined as time from surgery to death from any cause or last contact, allowing for some erroneously misclassified deaths. CONCLUSIONS: ypTis is associated with worse overall survival than ypT0 for locally advanced rectal cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. For this cohort, clinical stage was not a significant predictor of survival. Prospective trials comparing survival for these pathologic outcomes are needed. See Video Abstract.

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Incidental Colonic Diverticulosis.

INTRODUCTION: The true prevalence and pathogenesis of diverticulosis is poorly understood. Risk factors for diverticulosis are presently unclear, with most clinicians attributing its development to years of chronic constipation. Previous studies have been limited by their failure to include young, ethnically diverse patient populations. METHODS: Patients who presented to the emergency department of our hospital from January-September 2019 and underwent abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan for the evaluation of appendicitis were included. CT's were reviewed for the presence of diverticulosis. Risk factors for diverticulosis were determined for two age groups: >40 and ≤ 40. RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were included in the study. The median age was 38.57.1% were male. 81.6% were Hispanic. 43.5% had colonic diverticulosis on CT. 198 patients (55.1%) were ≤ age 40. The rate of diverticulosis in this group was 35.3% (n = 70). Those with diverticulosis were not significantly older (median age 29 versus 27, P = 0.061) but had a higher median body mass index (BMI) (28.4 versus 25.3, P = 0.003) compared to those without diverticulosis. On multivariate analysis, no characteristics were associated with the presence of diverticulosis for this group. Over age 40, 53.4% of patients (n = 86) had diverticulosis. Patients with diverticulosis were more likely to be Hispanic (95.3% versus 73.3%, P ≤ 0.001), less likely to be Asian (2.4% versus 16.0%, P = 0.004), had a higher median BMI (28.7 versus 25.5, P ≤ 0.001), and were more likely to use alcohol (30.2% versus 14.7%, P = 0.024) than those without diverticulosis. On multivariate analysis, characteristics associated with the presence of diverticulosis were BMI >30 (odds ratio OR 2.22, 95% confidence interval CI 1.03-4.80), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 10.05, 95% CI 1.74-58.26), and alcohol use (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.26-9.39). CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher rate of asymptomatic diverticulosis in the <40 cohort than previously reported in the literature. Obesity, alcohol use, and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with the presence of diverticulosis in patients > age 40, but no risk factors for diverticulosis were identified for patients ≤ age 40, suggesting that diverticular pathogenesis may differ by age. Constipation was not a risk factor for diverticulosis in either age group. The data regarding the prevalence of diverticulosis in Hispanic patients is lacking and should be the focus of future inquiry.

Comparative Effectiveness and Risks of Bowel Preparation Before Elective Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between bowel preparation and surgical site infections (SSIs), and also other postoperative complications, after elective colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: SSI is a major source of postoperative morbidity/costs after colorectal surgery. The value of preoperative bowel preparation to prevent SSI remains controversial. METHODS: We analyzed 32,359 patients who underwent elective colorectal resections in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2014. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed; propensity adjustment using patient/procedure characteristics was used to account for nonrandom receipt of bowel preparation. RESULTS: 26.7%, 36.6%, 3.8%, and 32.9% of patients received no bowel preparation, mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), oral antibiotics (OA), and MBP + OA, respectively. After propensity adjustment, MBP was not associated with decreased risk of SSI compared with no bowel preparation. In contrast, both OA and OA + MBP were associated with decreased risk of any SSI (adjusted odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.64; and adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.50, respectively) compared with no bowel preparation. OA and MBP + OA were associated with decreased risks of anastomotic leak, postoperative ileus, readmission, and also shorter length of stay (all P < 0.05). Bowel preparation was not associated with increased risk of cardiac/renal complications compared with no preparation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MBP alone before elective colorectal resection to prevent SSI is ineffective and should be abandoned. In contrast, OA and MBP + OA are associated with decreased risks of SSI and are not associated with increased risks of other adverse outcomes compared with no preparation. Prospective studies to determine the efficacy of OA are warranted; in the interim, MBP + OA should be used routinely before elective colorectal resection to prevent SSI.

An Informed Consent Program Enhances Surgery Resident Education.

OBJECTIVE: First-year residents often obtain informed consent from patients. However, they typically receive no formal training in this area before residency. We wished to determine whether an educational program would improve residents' comfort with this process. DESIGN: Our institution created an informed consent educational program, which included a didactic component, a role-play about informed consent, and a simulation exercise using standardized patients. Residents completed surveys before and after the intervention, and responses to survey questions were compared using the signed-rank test. SETTING: This study took place at Temple University Hospital, a tertiary care institution in Philadelphia, PA. PARTICIPANTS: First-year surgery and emergency medicine residents at Temple University Hospital in 2014 participated in this study. Thirty-two residents completed the preintervention survey and 27 residents completed the educational program and postintervention survey. RESULTS: Only 37.5% had ever received formal training in informed consent before residency. After participating in the educational program, residents were significantly more confident that they could correctly describe the process of informed consent, properly fill out a procedure consent form, and properly obtain informed consent from a patient. Their comfort level in obtaining informed consent significantly increased. They found the educational program to be very effective in improving their knowledge and comfort level in obtaining informed consent. In all, 100% (N = 27) of residents said they would recommend the use of the program with other first-year residents. CONCLUSIONS: Residents became more confident in their ability to obtain informed consent after participating in an educational program that included didactic, role-play, and patient simulation elements.